Who Were They?

Lost and forgotten photos from the past

photo-30

Today we look at a portrait of the McElhinney family, location unknown. They are identified on the back as:

Uncle Frank McElhinney

Aunt Meta Montgomery McElhinney

Rae McElhinney Reid

John Harold McElhinney

About 1920

My assumption is that the older two are Uncle Frank and Aunt Meta, and the younger two are Rae and John. They are an attractive family who appear to be well taken care of, considering their clothing looks nice and clean, their faces are full, and the women have slight smiles.

The photographer’s stamp didn’t quite emboss the folder, so I believe it is E. K. Porter. The name of the city was in tiny letters under a swoop made from the descending K that went under Porter, but since the lower portion of the stamp didn’t take, I cannot make it out. Rats!

UPDATE: Iggy did it again! Frank M McElhinney (abt 1854) and Metta McElhinney (2-11-1854 – 3-26-1919) were parents to Rachel “Rae” (abt 1882) and John Harold. Rae married John Wiley 9-4-1906, and shows a child J. C. Wiley aged 7 years on the 1915 census. See the comments for more details!

photo-37

 

This pretty image is approximately 7×9 or so, with the image centered on bristol board. The style of clothing worn by this pretty girl makes me wonder if this is a reprint, as the dress and hairstyle look to be from the mid 19th century, or possibly a bit later, maybe the 1870s. I am not completely certain though because girl’s fashions didn’t change as radically as women’s fashions as the bustle appeared in the 1870s and finally left in the 1880s. While girls were often dressed as small women, their skirts were not often as elaborate as adult fashions. Plus with her sitting it is impossible to tell if she has a demi-bustle or what.

She is a pretty girl, with rings on her fingers, a lovely pin, and fancy headband. Someone loved her quite a lot. I’d guess her age is between 10-12 years.

photo-36

I find this photo to be quite unusual, in that the couple has some clothing that is different from what we consider the “norm” in antique photos. The lady looks world weary, doesn’t she? The poor thing looks beat down, really, maybe from child rearing or illness, who knows. Her dress hangs like a bag on her, making it look like she has a big gut and no bosom. The wide lace collar doesn’t do much to dress up the ugly bodice of her dress.The gentleman has an interesting hat, one which I tend to associate with the Orthodox Greek tradition for some reason. His coat looks worn and boy does he look tired. His tie is in a modern Windsor knot style.

The photo itself is in fair condition and the bristol board is worn, broken and damaged in several areas. It was not well loved and preserved for some reason.

The photographer is Horn’s Studio at 1684 Madison Ave, New York. The location is just two blocks from Central Park North and Fifth Ave, in Manhattan. The location is north of the advertising district made famous in recent years by the television show Mad Men. I couldn’t find anything on the photographer with a brief search on Google; I just don’t have the time this morning.

What do you think about this photo and the couple pictured?

UPDATE: Thanks to insightful reader input, this photo is probably of a Jewish couple. “East Harlem was where the second largest number of Jews from Eastern Europe lived at the time next to the Lower East Side which had the largest population. She, of course, is not wearing a corset–not surprising for an immigrant woman. And his hat differs a little bit from the Greek Orthodox ones. It’s called a High Kippah and is worn most often by older men.”

photo-44

 

This photograph dating from the early 20th century is about 4″ wide with the matting. It shows four girls who look like they are about 10-12 years old, and the title “The Big Four” tells me these girls were inseparable. Were they friends, cousins, sisters? The back has their initials, but no other names. I sure do wish I knew them and their story! The photographer’s mark is embossed in the right hand corner, indicating Warren.

photo-42

Who wants a cookie?

For some fun, here’s a photo of ten dogs. They look to be hunting dogs, and while I’m not up on breeds, perhaps these are pointers of some kind? Maybe someone will know. The fellow in the hat looks like he’s holding up a cookie since several of the dogs are looking at him with great attention. :-)